Pacers break the script: Why Indiana is leading the NBA Finals

The odds and experts chose the Oklahoma City Thunder to dominate the 2025 NBA Finals. Many even predicted that the series would end in just five games—or worse, a sweep. But the Indiana Pacers had other plans. They now lead the series 2–1, proving that they’re not just along for the ride.

Game 1 was a thriller, with the Pacers taking the lead in the final 0.3 seconds. Although they fell in Game 2 as OKC appeared to regain form, Indiana bounced back in Game 3, showing they can finish strong and control the game with a comfortable margin.

First on the list is their success in locking down league MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. The Pacers held SGA to just 24 points and forced six turnovers in Game 3.

Pre-series expectations had Gilgeous-Alexander averaging at least 32 points per game, but Indiana’s defenders kept him eight points below that mark.

Andrew Nembhard and Ben Sheppard led the charge, applying the same defensive scheme they used against Knicks star Jalen Brunson in the Eastern Conference Finals. Their physical and calculated approach frustrated the usually explosive SGA and limited his overall impact.

Another critical factor has been Indiana’s bench depth—most notably Bennedict Mathurin, who exploded for 27 points in just 22 minutes of play in Game 3. His performance was ultra-efficient, shooting 75% from the field and an impressive 88% from the free-throw line. Mathurin made the most of every opportunity, becoming a major x-factor and energizing the team off the bench.

Adding to the momentum shift was the gritty performance of T.J. McConnell. He brought hustle, energy, and tenacity, tallying five steals—including three off inbounds plays—disrupting OKC’s rhythm and fueling the home crowd. In just 15 minutes, he finished with 10 markers and five dimes, providing an emotional spark that helped Indiana gain separation.

Tyrese Haliburton’s consistency and leadership also deserve recognition. He drilled the game-winner in Game 1, remained competitive in Game 2 despite the loss, and stepped up big again in Game 3 with 22 points, 11 assists, and nine rebounds—just one board shy of a triple-double.

Haliburton managed the game masterfully, drawing defenders and setting up teammates for open shots while also knowing when to take over offensively. His poise and intelligence have helped steer this young Pacers team with confidence.

Myles Turner also played a huge role with his defensive anchoring. He was a wall in the paint, shutting down Chet Holmgren late in Game 3 and forcing OKC to abandon their inside attack. Turner's rim protection was instrumental in Indiana’s fourth-quarter dominance, where they outscored the Thunder 32–18.

While the Pacers executed brilliantly, the Thunder struggled with uncharacteristic sloppiness. OKC committed 19 turnovers—one of their worst showings of the season—due to Indiana’s relentless pressure and active hands. The Thunder, usually composed in tight games, lost control in the final stretch and failed to make timely adjustments when Indiana pulled ahead.

Lastly, the quiet leadership of Pascal Siakam has made a difference. The Eastern Conference Finals MVP may not have eye-popping stats in every game, but his presence, experience, and championship pedigree provide calm and direction in critical moments. Sometimes, it’s not about the numbers—just having a guy who’s been there before.

Indiana is playing with heart, cohesion, and confidence. They’re defending, sharing the ball, and outworking the top seed. If they keep this up, the Pacers might just erase their underdog label—and bring the championship home to Indianapolis.